Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of


  • Hardcover
  • 368 pages
  • Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge
  • Robert Audi
  • English
  • 02 December 2019
  • 0415281083

10 thoughts on “Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge

  1. Jacob Aitken Jacob Aitken says:

    Some sections were dense sledding, like the one on sense perception Still, even those sections were worth it I found his discussion on John Locke very clear and introductory, allowing one to move to a reading of Locke himself In the first few chapters Audi is trying to show that memory, perception, and testimony serve as sources of belief, if not intended to serve as foundations.Audi gives us a fine discussion on justified, true belief and the architecture of knowledge This leads to the disc Some sections were dense sledding, like the one on sense perception Still, even those sections were worth it I found his discussion on John Locke very clear and introductory, allowing one to move to a reading of Locke himself In the first few chapters Audi is trying to show that memory, perception, and testimony serve as sources of belief, if not intended to serve as foundations.Audi gives us a fine discussion on justified, true belief and the architecture of knowledge This leads to the discussion of internalism vs externalism and how that entails shapes other beliefs.The two chapters on skepticism were good and the reader is aware of all the problems as a result problem of other minds problem of induction, etc He ends with a decent if inadequate at points rebuttal to skepticism if skepticism is true, can I know that I am thinking about skepticism He offers a positive defense of common sense though not necessarily the Reidian variety one does not have to have the KK principle knowing entails knowing that one knows This leads to an infinite regress.Observations Ironically, sometimes Audi s endnotes areenlightening than the main argument themselves The book end with a wonderful annotated bibliography the inclusion of which is what separates great books from good books The section on testimony was quite good He did note Reid s contributions and he did deal with Plantinga, but I think his chapter would have been stronger if Audi reworked the argument to say that one is warranted by having a prima facie credulity in testimony until sufficient defeaters prove otherwise Sometimes when the narrative appears to get bogged down in highly technical details, Audi will rescue the argument with a subsequently fine chapter This keeps the reader from despairing As every reviewer has noted, the prose is painful To be fair I am not sure how this could have been otherwise This is a highly technical and advanced the subtitle notwithstanding book on a specific subset of philosophy It s going to be hard reading no matter what


  2. Farhan Niazi Farhan Niazi says:

    This review is from the perspective of a general reader, not someone specializing in philosophy Epistemology, a core field of philosophy, has bearing on your views about other topics I came to this book after having read a very readable introduction to the topic An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge As a general readerinterested in issues related to justification and skepticism, this book was not as useful for me as Lemos s book as it begins with, and spends a large amount of time o This review is from the perspective of a general reader, not someone specializing in philosophy Epistemology, a core field of philosophy, has bearing on your views about other topics I came to this book after having read a very readable introduction to the topic An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge As a general readerinterested in issues related to justification and skepticism, this book was not as useful for me as Lemos s book as it begins with, and spends a large amount of time on, sources of knowledge as opposed to the structure and analysis of it, even though there is a short introduction to those concepts in the beginning I found that rather odd but still dragged through This brings me to the next criticism there were some useful insights but over all the author was too pedantic on issues and distinctions i couldn t bring myself to care about The writing is quite dense, muchso than Lemos s and i believe that many parts could have been explainedsimply When i got to thejuicy parts on justification and skepticism, there weren t a very many new insights and the crux of it i had already covered in Lemos s book this wasn t a criticism by the way i couldn t bring myself to finish the book owing to my interests, the writing style, the excessive detail so i skimmed through the later parts and read some topics that seemed interesting Overall, i cant say this was a satisfactory introduction Keep in mind that i am a general reader with specific interests within this topic and a desire to avoid needless distinctions that confusethan they enlighten If you are a specialist or you careabout detailed coverage of certain topics that are probably not very interesting for the general reader, perhaps you will find the book useful For the purposes of an introductory survey i think Lemos s book is much, much better


  3. miso miso miso miso says:

    kind of tortuous but good had to read it for my philosophy class.


  4. John Turlockton John Turlockton says:

    Very badly written He explains concepts very badly using very imprecise language, he then uses those poorly defined concepts as the basis for the book, using them again and again without explaining them clearly Despite being inadequate in the previously mentioned area, he is very longwinded and boring in the rest of the book, going over and over parts which are actually quite simple and don t need to be complicated as he does An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge by Noah Lemos is far bet Very badly written He explains concepts very badly using very imprecise language, he then uses those poorly defined concepts as the basis for the book, using them again and again without explaining them clearly Despite being inadequate in the previously mentioned area, he is very longwinded and boring in the rest of the book, going over and over parts which are actually quite simple and don t need to be complicated as he does An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge by Noah Lemos is far better, better written,concise and much better explained


  5. Stephen Bedard Stephen Bedard says:

    A good solid introduction to epistemology If you are looking to get an idea of the current discussions on knowledge, this is a great place to start.


  6. Maureen Bellwoar Maureen Bellwoar says:

    this book is the biggest pain in my ass a few years ago when i started college and was studying philosophy i had to take epistemology 101 This book was the one we had to read from for class..it was an insane choice by my teacher Audi is NOT a good introduction source for epistemology the book is fine im sure but only if you have a background in epistemology The students were a bunch of freshmen who are either taking epistemology to get there one philosophy requirement or taking it becaus this book is the biggest pain in my ass a few years ago when i started college and was studying philosophy i had to take epistemology 101 This book was the one we had to read from for class..it was an insane choice by my teacher Audi is NOT a good introduction source for epistemology the book is fine im sure but only if you have a background in epistemology The students were a bunch of freshmen who are either taking epistemology to get there one philosophy requirement or taking it because they are at the beginning of studying philosophy in school Audi is not the right source for this to further complicate things, the teacher did not agree with much of what Audi wrote So between being befuddled about the book and trying to reconcile what the teacher was telling us it was a horrible class For a long time even hearing the name Audi would give me instant stress that term was horrible because of this book I would spend hours trying to understand just one concept, and i would have dreams where all i could think about was justified true belief they were nightmares.Im sure this book would be great if read in the proper context.like graduate school


  7. Muhammad Shemyal Nisar Muhammad Shemyal Nisar says:

    A very good and at times very dense a book for the introduction to the subject as well as for refreshing your knowledge for those who have been out of touch for some time


  8. Rachael Rachael says:

    This is an excellent and useful review of epistemology Audi slowly builds a case for moderate foundationalism while overviewing other major positions and ending with a critique of skepticism On the way he gives an accounting of what counts as basic non inferential knowledge including perceptual beliefs, from introspection, reason and memory A sort of secondary non inferential source is from testimony Then he talks about the overall architecture of our noetic system, comparing and foundatio This is an excellent and useful review of epistemology Audi slowly builds a case for moderate foundationalism while overviewing other major positions and ending with a critique of skepticism On the way he gives an accounting of what counts as basic non inferential knowledge including perceptual beliefs, from introspection, reason and memory A sort of secondary non inferential source is from testimony Then he talks about the overall architecture of our noetic system, comparing and foundationalism and coherentism and suggesting a moderate foundationalism taking into account extra factors such as coherence as potential defeaters He also includes a fascinating chapter applying these concepts to the possibility of scientific, ethical and religious knowledge


  9. Landon W Landon W says:

    Best single volume introductory survey of epistemology that I know of Audi writes clearly and cogently, and covers an impressive breadth of topics The book is weak in the area of social epistemology, but that is forgivable as it was authored before the current explosion of interest in that area I would still recommend it as an excellent starting point for anyone with a serious interest in analytic epistemology.


  10. Quentin Quentin says:

    It could have been one third the size it is too prolix It could have beenconcise and thusclear However, it actually is an excellent introduction to epistemology if you have the time and patience I had the time as well as patience.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge❰Reading❯ ➸ Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge Author Robert Audi – Buyprobolan50.co.uk This comprehensive book introduces the concepts and theories central for understanding knowledge It aims to reach students who have already done an introductory philosophy courseTopics covered include This comprehensive book Contemporary Introduction MOBI î introduces the concepts and theories central for understanding knowledge It aims to reach students who have already done an introductory philosophy courseTopics covered include perception and reflection as grounds of knowledge, and the nature, structure, and varieties of knowledge The character and scope of knowledge in the crucial realms of ethics, science and religion are also consideredUnique features of Epistemology Provides a comprehensive survey of basic concepts and major theories Gives an up to date account of important developments in the field Contains many lucid examples to support Epistemology: A PDF/EPUB or ideas Cites key literature in an annotated bibliography.


About the Author: Robert Audi

Is a well Contemporary Introduction MOBI î known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge book, this is one of the most wanted Robert Audi author readers around the world.